Talk:20090111231433

Brad,

I guess the color is probably a matter of opinion, but I prefer the red in the 4th version rather than the pink. --Ken Roy 17:16, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Can I just comment that in general I think all these graphics are too large - too tall - if they could be down around 100 - 150 pixels tall there would be 200 - 150 extra pixels for page content in the window without scrolling.

OK so I don't understand how this commenting thing works - the comment above is from Roger

I concur with both above suggestions. The graphic can be wider, such as by shifting the family group to the right of the textual info, and limiting the height to the height of this image. And I like the vibrant colours compared to the washed out ones. (Re commenting, adding username and timestamp on Wikipedia is often <space><dash><dash><space><tilde><tilde><tilde><tilde> and thereby very quick and easy to read, like mine here.) -- Lochneil 10:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Graphics width

I made them 700px wide. It would be easy enough to resize them down a little!--Bgaugler 00:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

The current one:

works for me - it's not too tall, so there's content available to read without having to scroll the page down right away -- TheKiwi 20:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree - this is by far the best choice offered to date. It's compact, clear, colourful, and catchy. Great work! -- Lochneil 21:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I would lose the graphic completely. People come here to find hard information on how to solve a TNG issue. No graphic means more relevant content is possible on the first screen people see upon arrival.

--R Morss 15:59, 24 October 2009 (UTC)